Verb Agreement With Couple


Posted on

That`s another problem. The verb in the quotation is plural, so the paraphrased part must provide a plural subject; singular “use” does not work. With the word couple, it is sometimes necessary to use a plural verb, even if the two people forming the couple act by writing. Here we did not want the subjunctive; “Only if the economy was strong enough.” The original quote, direct, was a kind of: “The Fed will only withdraw its support if the economy is strong enough.” After the “stressed” time spent, “is” changes in the simple past “was”. For most individual collective subtantifs – as a matter of group, employees or herds representing a unit with many members – we use a singular verb when the members of the group act together: even if the number of points of view has added up, the concerns within the company about the future of the place were. But because “couple” means “two” or “a small number,” it only takes pluralistic obliques for the good plural verb to be “are” in your example. Let`s use the collective “couple” as an example. If you think of the pair as two separate people doing separate things, you would probably use a plural verb. For example, you would say, “The couple is going on holiday separately this year,” because they are two different people doing two different things. On the other hand, if you think of torque as a unit, you would probably use a singular verb. For example, you would say, “Every couple goes to Bermuda on a different day.” You only have to use your best judgment, and although it seems difficult, the good news is that you can never really do it wrong because 1) there is no real rule, and 2) You can always simply say that you considered the couple as an individual (or unit) if someone questions your choice of verb (2). Here`s another example. A listener, Jody, asks how to use the word “family.” She wants to know what`s right: “Tim`s family is rancher” or “Tim`s family is a rancher.” Jody says they prefer “are,” but that Word`s grammar exam is preferred.

She wants to know if a little plural, like Rancher, according to the verb makes a difference. In this case, no matter what comes after the verb; What matters is the idea you are trying to convey. In Jody`s example “Ranchers,” I would also prefer “are” because it seems that you are referring to a number of separate individuals. What would happen if we changed “Rancher,” a nostantif, to “rich” an adjective? “Tim`s family is rich” or “Tim`s family is rich”? In this case, I would prefer “is,” because it seems we are talking about a family, a unit. With one couple, you can`t refer to the fact that both couples work, because there is only one couple. You should refer to individuals or members or use another term that highlights one person in the couple`s other. (If you know the couple, use a name.) The good thing about this question is that, whatever answer you commit to, there will be some leaders of the past (or recently) who will say that you made the wrong choice, thus freeing you from worrying a lot. At the end of the 19th century, some commentators felt that the couple should not be used for a group of two people, but only for two related or united things.